Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 177 
EARLY AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF MITRAL VALVE 
REPAIR FOR MITRAL REGURGITATION DUE TO 
ISOLATED POSTERIOR LEAFLET PROLAPSE 
 Tran Ngoc Vu*; Le Ngoc Thanh** 
SUMMARY 
Objectives: To evaluate the long-term results of mitral valve repair in patients with mitral 
regurgitation caused by isolated posterior leaflet prolapse at Danang Hospital. Subjects and 
methods: A retrospective, descriptive study combined with a prospective study. Thirty two 
patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation due to isolated posterior leaflet prolapse were 
treated by new surgical techniques in Danang Hospital from February 2010 to October 2017. 
Preoperative, pre-discharge and follow-up findings were recorded. Postoperative 
echocardiography was performed in all patients at predischarge and during clinical follow-up. 
Late survival and freedom from adverse events including hemorrhage, endocarditis, 
reoperation, and residual severe mitral regurgitation were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier 
survival analysis. Results: Ages ranged from 12 to 68 years (mean 43.06 ± 15.78 years). 
According to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification: 3.12% (1/32) of 
patients were in class I; 90.63% (29/32) were in class II; 6.25% (2/32) were in class III, and no 
patient was in class IV; 32 patients (100%) had severe mitral valve regurgitation (3+). Twenty-
six patients were treated by triangular resection of posterior leaflet; five patients by chordal 
replacement and one patient by both techniques. Echocardiography was carried out in all 
patients before discharged from hospital; 96.88% of patients had no or mild regurgitation, and 
3.12% of patients had moderate regurgitation (2+), no one had severe regurgitation; no in-
hospital mortality. Late mortality occurred in only one patient at 3 months after discharge 
because of severe heart failure. The mean follow-up time of patients was 36.44 ± 26.09 months 
(from 3 to 94 months), all the 31 surviving patients were in NYHA class I. Echocardiographic 
examination during follow-up revealed that mitral insufficiency was none or mild (≤ 1+) in 100% 
of patients. No patient had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. Kaplan-Meier survival 
analysis estimates were 96.9 ± 3.1% for late survival and 96.9 ± 3.1% for freedom from 
recurrent severe mitral regurgitation at 7 years. Conclusion: Mitral repair for mitral regurgitation 
due to isolated posterior leaflet prolapse is a feasible and safe procedure with an excellent 
surgical long-term outcomes. 
* Keywords: Mitral valve; Isolated posterior prolapse mitral regurgitation; Mitral repair. 
INTRODUCTION 
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a very common 
valvular disease. Surgical treatment 
improves patients' prognosis and quality 
of the life [1]. Posterior leaflet prolapse 
is the most common lesion seen in 
degenerative mitral valve disease [2]. 
Quadrangular resection, first proposed by 
* Danang Hospital 
** Hanoi E Hospital 
Corresponding author: Tran Ngoc Vu (
[email protected]) 
 Date received: 10/07/2018 
 Date accepted: 30/08/2018 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 178
Alain Carpentier, has progressed to 
become the gold standard modality to 
repair posterior leaflet prolapse. Although 
this “resection technique” is safe, 
reproducible, and offers favorable long-
term results, it presents major drawbacks 
[3]. Tri-angular leaflet resection of the 
mitral valve produces durable results and 
can be safely and efficiently performed 
with minimal morbidity and mortality [4]. 
The use of artificial chordae to correct the 
leaflet prolapse restores the normal 
anatomy and physiology of the mitral 
valve, thus producing an optimal surface 
of coaptation [3]. Our research aims to: 
Evaluate the long-term results of mitral 
valve repair in patients with mitral 
regurgitation caused by isolated posterior 
leaflet prolapse. 
SUBJECTS AND METHODS 
1. Subjects. 
This study was carried out at Danang 
Hospital from February 2010 to October 
2017. Thirty-two consecutive patients with 
chronic severe MR due to isolated 
posterior leaflet prolapse underwent mitral 
valve repair. Patients with tricuspid 
insufficiency were included. 
2. Methods. 
Retrospective combined with prospective 
study, cross-sectional descriptive analysis 
without control group. 
* Preoperative assessment: 
Clinical assessment by NYHA class. 
Severity of MR was defined by Doppler 
echocardiography (grade 1+, 2+, 3+, and 
4+) by semiquantitative method. The etiology 
of MR was identified by surgeon during 
operation. 
* Surgical indications: 
Indications for mitral surgery, as 
expressed in the guidelines, were based 
on levels of evidence B [5]. 
* Surgical technique: 
All operations were performed through 
a full median sternotomy and under 
cardio-pulmonary bypass with ascending 
aortic and bicaval canulation and aortic 
cross-clamping for the entire valve repair 
time. Myocardial protection was 
accomplished with intermittent cold blood 
cardioplegia given down the aortic root. 
The mitral valve was exposed through 
transseptal or left atrial approach. The 
mitral valve was then inspected in detail 
and the prolapsed area was identified. We 
used the triangular resection and chordal 
replacement techniques or combined both 
techniques for repair the prolapsed area 
of posterior leaflet. Finally, a complete 
flexible ring or a pericardial band was 
applied for mitral annuloplasty. 
* Postoperative assessment: 
All patients had a transthoracic 
echocardiography study before hospital 
discharge. 
Follow-up investigations included clinical 
examination, electrocardiography, and 
Doppler echocardiography. Doppler 
echocardiography was carried out every 
3 months in the first postoperative year and 
every 6 months thereafter. Results were 
recoded at the latest follow-up examination. 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 179 
* Statistical analysis: 
Descriptive statistics are reported as 
the mean ± standard deviation for 
continuous variables and compared by a 
student t-test or Wilcoxon Signed Ranks 
test. Categoric variables are reported as 
frequencies and percentages and were 
compared using Chi-square tests. For 
statistical analysis, the statistical software 
SPSS version 22.0 for Windows was 
used, and p value less than 0.05 was 
considered statistically significant. 
RESULTS 
1. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. 
Table 1: Preoperative baseline characteristics. 
Variable Value 
Age (year) 42.84 ± 15.83 
Gender (male/female) 24/8 
NYHA functional status: 
NYHA I 3.12% 
NYHA II 90.63% 
NYHA III 6.25% 
Atrial fibrillation 21.88% 
Cardiothoracic ratio 0.57 ± 0.07 
Mean systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg) 53.13 ± 15.12 
Mean left ventricle end-systolic diameter (mm) 35.97 ± 6.40 
Mean left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (mm) 58.91 ± 7.70 
Mean left atrium diameter (mm) 46.63 ± 9.41 
Mean ejection fraction (%) 67.41 ± 8.31 
Grade 3 MR (3+) 100% 
There were 24 men (75.0%) and 
8 women (25.0%). Mean age ranged from 
12 to 68 years (mean age 43.06 ± 15.78 
years). The patients were of NYHA 
functional class I 3.12%, class II 90.63%, 
class III 6.25%, and no patient in class IV. 
The cardiothoracic ratio ranged from 0.45 
to 0.66 (mean 0.57 ± 0.07). 100% of 
patients had severe MR (grade 3+) on 
Doppler echocardiograhy. 
* Etiology of MR: 
The most frequent cause of non-
ischemic structural MR was degenerative 
mitral valve disease (24 patients = 75.0%), 
and low incidence was rheumatic valvular 
disease (1 patients = 3.12%). Other 
etiology was endocarditis (4 patients 
= 12.5%) and congenital (3 patients 
= 9.38%). 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 180
Table 2: Procedures. 
Procedures No. of patients % 
Ring annuloplasty 31 96.88 
Posterior annuloplasty band 1 3.13 
Triangular resection of posterior leaftet 26 81.25 
Chordal replacement 5 15.63 
Triangular resection and chordal replacement 1 3.13 
Tricuspid annuloplasty 6 18.75 
Coronay artery bypass graft 1 3.13 
Table 2 describes the predominant repair technique for isolated posterior leaflet 
prolapse. Triangular resection was the most common technique in our series (81.25%) 
and the annulus dilatation was treated with prosthetic ring remodeling annuloplasty in 
31 patients (96.88%). Prosthetic ring sizes ranged from 26 to 32 (mean 29.42 ± 1.57). 
Chordal replacement in 15.63% and one patient having a combination of both leaflet 
resection and chordal implanted (3.13%). Concomitant operation performed was 
tricuspid valve repair in 6 patients (18.75%). 
2. Before discharge results. 
Table 3: Early postoperative results. 
Outcome Value 
Intensive care unit stay (day) (mean) 2.16 ± 1.25 
Hospital stay (day) (mean) 11.03 ± 3.57 
Neurological complications 0,0% 
Mediastinitis 0,0% 
Acute renal failure 0,0% 
Low cardiac output syndrome 6.25% 
Surgical site infections 6.25% 
Pneumonia 3.12% 
Central venous catheter infection 3.12% 
MR severity: 
None to 1+ MR 96.88% 
2+ MR 3.12% 
In-hospital mortality 0,0% 
The mean hospital stay was 11.03 ± 3.57 days (range 6 - 22 days). The mean 
intensive care unit stay was 2.16 ± 1.25 days (range 1 - 6 days). The postoperative 
complications were low in our series. 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 181 
All patients had undergone a postoperative pre-discharge transthoracic 
echocardiography, 96.88% of patients had no or mild regurgitation and 3.12% of 
patients had moderate regurgitation (2+), no one had severe regurgitation; no in-
hospital mortality. 
3. Long-term results. 
Table 4: Long-term postoperative results. 
Variable Preop (n = 32) Postop (n = 31) p 
NYHA class: 
 NYHA I 3.13% 100% 
 NYHA II 90.63% 0,0% 
 NYHA III 6.25% 0,0% 
 NYHA (mean) 2.03 ± 0.31 1.0 ± 0.0 
< 0.05 
Electrocardiographic findings: 
 Sinus rhythm 78.12% 96.77% 
 Atrial fibrillation 21.88% 3.23% 
< 0.05 
Echocardiographic findings: 
 LVESD (mm) 35.97 ± 6.40 31.10 ± 5.23 
 LVEDD (mm) 58.91 ± 7.70 47.06 ± 6.60 
 LAD (mm) 46.63 ± 9.41 34.68 ± 11.34 
 SPAP (mmHg) 53.13 ± 15.12 30.65 ± 2.15 
< 0.001 
Grade MR on echocardiography: 
 1+(1/4) 0.00% 100% 
 2+(2/4) 0,0% 0,0% 
 3+(3/4) 100% 0,0% 
 Grade (mean) 3.0 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0 
< 0.001 
(LVESD: Left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDD: Left ventricular end-diastolic 
diameter; LAD: Left atrial diameter; SPAP: Systolic pulmonary artery pressure; EF: 
Ejection fraction; MR: Mitral regurgitation) 
Table 4 summarizes the preoperative and long-term postoperative data of mitral 
valve repair. The mean follow-up period of patients was 36.44 ± 26.09 months (from 3 
to 94 months). No patient need to reoperation, no patient had anticoagulation related 
hemorrhage and endocarditis during the follow-up. Late mortality occurred in only one 
patient at 3 months after operation because of severe heart failure due to severe 
recurrent MR. All the 31 surviving patients were in NYHA class I. Echocardiographic 
examination during follow-up revealed that mitral insufficiency was none or mild (≤ 1+) 
in 100% of patients. 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 182
DISCUSSION 
Mitral regurgitation is a very common 
valvular disease. Mitral repair is a method 
of choice in treatment of significant MR 
[1]. Mitral valve repair techniques were 
pioneered by Alain Carpentier with a rigid 
annuloplasty ring in his publication the 
“French Correction” [6]. Surgical techniques 
have continuously developed over the 
past five decades [7]. There are many 
techniques to correct the prolapsing 
leaflet, and there has been a move away 
from the traditional posterior leaflet 
resection (quadrangular resection/sliding 
technique) to leaflet preservation 
techniques with Gore-Tex neochordae [8]. 
The classic quadrangular resection technique 
became the gold standard for isolated 
posterior leaflet prolape. This method has 
several disadvantages like lack of height 
of leaflet coaptation, deformation of the 
sub-annular region of the left ventricle and 
the risk of king-king of the circumflex 
artery. Triangular resection reduced 
some disadvantages of quadrangular 
resection. In our practice, no quadrangular 
resections were employed. We relied 
mostly on triangular resections of posterior 
leaflet (81.25%). It is quicker and easier 
to perform than standard quadrangular 
resection. Chordal replacement has also 
been used occasionally to correct the 
prolapse of the posterior leaflet (15.63%). 
On the other hand, in the case, after the 
greatest area of prolapse is resected, 
there still remains areas of chordal 
elongation where the posterior leaflet 
requires additional artificial chordae 
support (3.12%). George K.M et al [9] 
reported that triangular resection represents 
a simple and effective technique for the 
management of segmental posterior 
leaflet prolapse. Ibrahim M et al [10] 
concluded that the clinical outcomes of 
artificial chordae for the repair of the 
mitral valve are comparable with classical 
techniques and it may have some 
physiological advantages and provides a 
good long-term results. 
Our study demonstrates that the both 
techniques (triangular resection and 
neochord replacement) for isolated 
posterior leaflet prolapse repair had 
excellent results with 100% of patients 
having none or mild (≤ 1+) MR and no 
adverse complications after operation. 
CONCLUSION 
Isolated posterior leaflet prolapse is 
the most common lesion seen in 
degenerative mitral valve disease. 
Triangular posterior leaflet resection is an 
easy, effective and durable method for 
correcting posterior leaflet prolapse. 
Artificial chordal replacement has been 
shown to be effective and durable 
outcomes too. The combination of 
triangular resection and annuloplasty is 
an excellent option for mitral valve repair 
in most patients with isolated posterior 
leaflet prolapse. 
REFERENCES 
1. Němec P, Ondrášek J. Surgical treatment 
of mitral regurgitation. Cor Vasa. 2017, 59 (1), 
pp.e92-e96. 
2. Varghese R, Adams D.H. Techniques 
for repairing posterior leaflet prolapse of the 
mitral valve. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc 
Surg. 2011, 16 (4), pp.293-308. 
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
o
7-2018 
 183 
3. Perier P, Hohenberger W, Lakew F et al. 
Prolapse of the posterior leaflet: Resect or 
respect. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015, 4 (3), 
pp.273-277. 
4. Gazoni L.M, Fedoruk L.M, Kern J.A et 
al. A simplified approach to degenerative 
disease: Triangular resections of the mitral 
valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007, 83 (5), pp. 
1658-1665. 
5. Bonow R.O, Carabello B.A, Chatterjee K 
et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the 
management of patients with valvular heart 
disease: A report of the American College of 
Cardiology/American Heart Association task 
force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2006, 
114 (5), pp.e84-e231. 
6. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery - 
the “French correction.” J Thorac Cardiovasc 
Surg. 1983, 86, pp.323-337. 
7. Jouan J. Mitral valve repair over five 
decades. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015, 4 (4), 
pp.322-334. 
8. Bassin L, Weiss B, Cranney G et al. 
Operative outcomes with myxomatous mitral 
valve repair: Experience with 586 patients. 
Hear Lung Circ. 2016, 25 (8), pp.870-873. 
9. George K.M, Mihaljevic T. Triangular 
resection for posterior mitral prolapse: 
rationale for a simpler repair. J Heart Valve 
Dis. 2009, 18 (1), pp.119-121. 
10. Ibrahim M, Rao C, Savvopoulou M et 
al.. Outcomes of mitral valve repair using 
artificial chordae. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 
2014, 45 (4), pp.593-601.